Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
- Nottingham Forest held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 338Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 460Lead | Total passes | 385 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |