Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.39 vs 0.50, Δ 0.89).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Sheffield Utd was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Sheffield Utd |
|---|---|---|
| 1.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Sheffield Utd |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 343Lead | Accurate passes | 328 |
| 436 | Total passes | 437Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Sheffield Utd |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Sheffield Utd |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Sheffield Utd |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |