Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.57, Δ 0.22).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Tottenham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.57Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 179 | Accurate passes | 486Lead |
| 244 | Total passes | 547Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |