Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (2.32 vs 0.33, Δ 1.99).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.32Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 335Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 420Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.99 | Goals prevented | -0.99 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |