Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (2.82 vs 0.50, Δ 2.32).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.50 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 334 | Accurate passes | 355Lead |
| 406 | Total passes | 430Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |