Match statistics snapshot
- West Ham created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 2.42, Δ 1.69).
- West Ham fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- West Ham was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.42Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 470Lead | Accurate passes | 316 |
| 541Lead | Total passes | 385 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.29 | Goals prevented | 0.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.