Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target |
| 5Lead |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 70%Lead |
| 253 | Accurate passes | 274Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 389Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |