Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.92 vs 1.09, Δ 0.83).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 361 | Accurate passes | 453Lead |
| 438 | Total passes | 525Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |