Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.74, Δ 0.30).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 293Lead | Accurate passes | 279 |
| 367Lead | Total passes | 359 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |