Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (2.55 vs 0.42, Δ 2.13).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (35 vs 7 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 35Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 426Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 480Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| 2.04 | Goals prevented | 2.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |