Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 13%).
- Notts County held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Notts County | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 6Lead |
| 1 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Notts County | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 537Lead | Accurate passes | 190 |
| 605Lead | Total passes | 248 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Notts County | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Notts County | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Notts County | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.