Match statistics snapshot
- Notts County fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- Wolves U21 was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
- Notts County held more of the ball (77% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Notts County | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Notts County | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 77%Lead | Ball possession | 23% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 807Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 865Lead | Total passes | 271 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Notts County | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Notts County | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Notts County | Statistic | Wolves U21 |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.