Match statistics snapshot
- Novorizontino fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Amazonas was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
- Novorizontino held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 507Lead | Accurate passes | 160 |
| 570Lead | Total passes | 232 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |