Match statistics snapshot
- Novorizontino created the clearer chances on xG (2.06 vs 0.30, Δ 1.76).
- Novorizontino fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- Novorizontino was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 2.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 190 | Accurate passes | 331Lead |
| 281 | Total passes | 437Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |