Match statistics snapshot
- Novorizontino created the clearer chances on xG (2.78 vs 1.76, Δ 1.02).
- Novorizontino fired more attempts (28 vs 12 shots).
- Novorizontino held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.76 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 306Lead | Accurate passes | 220 |
| 399Lead | Total passes | 315 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.