Match statistics snapshot
- Novorizontino created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 0.19, Δ 0.69).
- Novorizontino fired more attempts (15 vs 4 shots).
- Ituano was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.19 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 196Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 282Lead | Total passes | 245 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Novorizontino | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.