Match statistics snapshot
- Nublense created the clearer chances on xG (1.52 vs 1.44, Δ 0.08).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nublense | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 1.52Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nublense | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 249Lead | Accurate passes | 246 |
| 340Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nublense | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nublense | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.69 | Goals prevented | 0.69 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nublense | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.