Match statistics snapshot
- Nublense fired more attempts (25 vs 8 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
- Nublense held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nublense | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nublense | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 621Lead | Accurate passes | 193 |
| 677Lead | Total passes | 261 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nublense | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nublense | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nublense | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.