Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 1.60, Δ 1.11).
- Colo Colo fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Nublense was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 212 | Accurate passes | 361Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 453Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |