Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Nublense was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 14%).
- Colo Colo held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 182 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 256 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nublense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |