Match statistics snapshot
- O'Higgins created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 0.42, Δ 1.29).
- O'Higgins fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Boston River was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| O'higgins | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| O'higgins | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 423Lead | Accurate passes | 319 |
| 486Lead | Total passes | 366 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| O'higgins | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| O'higgins | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.19 | Goals prevented | -0.19 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| O'higgins | Statistic | Boston River |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.