Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 1.52, Δ 0.79).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 354 | Accurate passes | 575Lead |
| 425 | Total passes | 659Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.