Match statistics snapshot
- Tromso created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 1.12, Δ 0.04).
- ODD Ballklubb was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- ODD Ballklubb held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 594Lead | Accurate passes | 361 |
| 666Lead | Total passes | 421 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Odd Ballklubb | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |