Match statistics snapshot
- Helsingborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 1.89, Δ 0.23).
- Oddevold fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Helsingborg was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.89Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 395Lead | Accurate passes | 357 |
| 463Lead | Total passes | 418 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |