Match statistics snapshot
- Helsingborg created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 1.75, Δ 1.14).
- Helsingborg fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Helsingborg was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.75Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
| 11 | Total shots | 14Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 557Lead | Accurate passes | 325 |
| 637Lead | Total passes | 395 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |