Match statistics snapshot
- Orebro SK created the clearer chances on xG (1.99 vs 2.14, Δ 0.15).
- Oddevold fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Oddevold was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 1.99 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.14Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 499Lead |
| 338 | Total passes | 580Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oddevold | Statistic | Orebro Sk |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |