Match statistics snapshot
- OFI fired more attempts (21 vs 4 shots).
- Lamia was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
- OFI held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ofi | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ofi | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 515Lead | Accurate passes | 185 |
| 590Lead | Total passes | 264 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ofi | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ofi | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ofi | Statistic | Lamia |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |