Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (0.95 vs 1.47, Δ 0.52).
- OH Leuven fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 0.95 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.47Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 4Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 336 | Accurate passes | 360Lead |
| 404 | Total passes | 424Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.92 | Goals prevented | 0.92 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.