Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (0.38 vs 1.01, Δ 0.63).
- KVC Westerlo was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 20%).
- OH Leuven held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.38 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 343Lead | Accurate passes | 275 |
| 436Lead | Total passes | 356 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 7 |
Statistics is not available yet.