Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 1.80, Δ 0.79).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- KVC Westerlo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.80Lead |
| 8 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 332 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 405 | Total passes | 433Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oh Leuven | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.