Match statistics snapshot
- Oita Trinita fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Oita Trinita was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 3Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 520Lead | Accurate passes | 514 |
| 596 | Total passes | 600Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Oita Trinita | Statistic | Shimizu S-pulse |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |