Match statistics snapshot
- Olimpia created the clearer chances on xG (2.11 vs 0.85, Δ 1.26).
- Olimpia fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Olimpia was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 45%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Olimpia | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Olimpia | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 315Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 374Lead | Total passes | 312 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Olimpia | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Olimpia | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Olimpia | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.