Match statistics snapshot
- Olimpija Ljubljana created the clearer chances on xG (2.09 vs 1.00, Δ 1.09).
- Lask Linz was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 36%).
- Lask Linz held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Olimpija Ljubljana | Statistic | Lask Linz |
|---|---|---|
| 2.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.00 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Olimpija Ljubljana | Statistic | Lask Linz |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 192 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 266 | Total passes | 554Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Olimpija Ljubljana | Statistic | Lask Linz |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Olimpija Ljubljana | Statistic | Lask Linz |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.42 | Goals prevented | 0.42 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Olimpija Ljubljana | Statistic | Lask Linz |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |