Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 1.19, Δ 0.58).
- Operario-PR was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
- Operario-PR held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.19Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 308Lead | Accurate passes | 204 |
| 388Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |