Match statistics snapshot
- Operario-PR fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Amazonas was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 43%).
- Operario-PR held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 352Lead | Accurate passes | 210 |
| 408Lead | Total passes | 283 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |