Match statistics snapshot
- Operario-PR created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 0.46, Δ 0.35).
- Operario-PR fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Operario-PR was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.46 |
| Offsides | ||
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 157 |
| 457Lead | Total passes | 244 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.