Match statistics snapshot
- Operario-PR created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 0.63, Δ 0.48).
- Operario-PR fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 268 | Accurate passes | 275Lead |
| 351 | Total passes | 353Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.11 | Goals prevented | -0.11 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.