Match statistics snapshot
- Operario-PR created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 0.47, Δ 0.26).
- Cuiaba was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 8%).
- Operario-PR held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 354Lead | Accurate passes | 189 |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 261 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |