Match statistics snapshot
- Operario-PR created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 0.71, Δ 0.31).
- Operario-PR fired more attempts (19 vs 7 shots).
- Ituano was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 182 |
| 539Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Operario-pr | Statistic | Ituano |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.