Match statistics snapshot
- Helsingborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.74 vs 1.82, Δ 0.08).
- Orebro SK fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Helsingborg was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.74 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.82Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 315 |
| 470Lead | Total passes | 384 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.