Match statistics snapshot
- Helsingborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 1.60, Δ 0.48).
- Orebro SK fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 8Lead |
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 431Lead | Accurate passes | 339 |
| 523Lead | Total passes | 429 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |