Match statistics snapshot
- Oddevold created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 1.44, Δ 0.69).
- Orebro SK fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Oddevold was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Oddevold |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Oddevold |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 516Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 604Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Oddevold |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Oddevold |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orebro Sk | Statistic | Oddevold |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |