Match statistics snapshot
- Helsingborg created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 2.33, Δ 1.36).
- Helsingborg fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Helsingborg was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orgryte Is | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.33Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orgryte Is | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 410 | Accurate passes | 427Lead |
| 494 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orgryte Is | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orgryte Is | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orgryte Is | Statistic | Helsingborg |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |