Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 0.17, Δ 1.70).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (22 vs 3 shots).
- Austin held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.17 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 338 | Accurate passes | 465Lead |
| 396 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.