Match statistics snapshot
- CF Montreal created the clearer chances on xG (0.48 vs 0.85, Δ 0.37).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (10 vs 4 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 0.48 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 89% |
| 450Lead | Accurate passes | 414 |
| 499Lead | Total passes | 465 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.72 | Goals prevented | -0.72 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 18Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.