Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.41 vs 0.55, Δ 1.86).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (20 vs 7 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 438Lead | Accurate passes | 300 |
| 496Lead | Total passes | 352 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.39 | Goals prevented | 1.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |