Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (0.91 vs 1.06, Δ 0.15).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 88% |
| 490Lead | Accurate passes | 471 |
| 541Lead | Total passes | 538 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -1.90 | Goals prevented | -1.90 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |