Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (21 vs 5 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 238 | Accurate passes | 516Lead |
| 304 | Total passes | 576Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.