Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (20 vs 17 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (59% on target vs 45%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6 | Shots off target | 6 |
| 10 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 9 |
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 356 | Accurate passes | 400Lead |
| 417 | Total passes | 453Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.