Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.24 vs 2.13, Δ 0.11).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.13 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 346 | Accurate passes | 359Lead |
| 400 | Total passes | 411Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Orlando City Sc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.